We’ll be contrasting the 675 and E5 two entry-level Roomba models in this comparison.
We’ll go over each of these two options individually in this article to show how they compare and contrast in key areas.
Overview of the Roomba 675 and E5
Intro: Roomba 675 vs. E5
It’s not difficult, however it can be tough to distinguish between different Roomba types. Tiers are used by iRobot to group its products. There are entry-level choices available, such as the 600-series robots 614, 675, and 690.
The E-series, which follows in order and has the same specs as the 600-series but uses the same bin as the I-Series robots, is next in line.
The 960 and 980 are the more affordable options from Roomba, whereas the I and S-series robots are the most expensive.
We’ll concentrate on the Roomba E5 and Roomba 675.
Possibly the Best Entry-Level Robot for Cleaning Carpets is the Roomba 675
Even though they lack bells and whistles, Roomba robots are popular due to their superior carpet cleaning capabilities.
Thanks to its counter-rotating brushes and dirt sensor, the Roomba 675 is among the best robots at accomplishing this.
The 675 is effective at cleaning debris deeply embedded in carpet fibres because to its combination.
No other brands can compare, no matter how appealing the features are.
It was among the best in its price range in thorough cleaning tests, picking up an average of 83%.
Better Brush Roll Than the 675 on the Roomba E5
E5 Roomba Top
The brush design on the 614, 675, and 690 models is one problem. If you look closely, it resembles a hybrid of a bristle brush and rubber blade. Contrary to what iRobot states, even shorter hair strands will attach to it, making it a hair magnet.
With minimal price increases, the Roomba E5 promises to solve this problem.
It has rubber extractors in place of the conventional brush, much like the more expensive Roombas I6 and I7.
These brand-new brushes don’t have bristles and are better able to withstand tangling caused by both canine and human hair.
Similarities between the I5 and the Roomba 675
These two robot vacuums are among the cheaper alternatives to Roombas. Right now, the 675 is less expensive than the E5.
1. Orientation
These robots are equipped with iRobot’s adaptive navigation, which causes them to travel in an erratic manner.
None of these choices can save or remember maps.
There is no way to resume or recharge. Once the battery is low, it will start to bounce around the area before docking to recharge.
These robots have the advantage of being able to completely cover the region despite its irregularity.
All of the places will be thoroughly cleaned, and filth will be detected very thoroughly. What sets Roomba apart from competing brands is this feature.
A proprietary technology called “dirt detect” directs the robot to concentrate more on areas that are dirtier.
2. Underneath Single Side Brush Roomba 675 versus E5
The single-side brush pattern is another commonality. Except for the S9, it is a constant in all Roomba products.
The speed at which it rotates is one concern I have with it. Large debris piled tend to be dispersed by it. But since the robot will only have to deal with dust during routine cleanings, it won’t be a problem.
3. WIFI and iRobot Home App Compatibility
Both options support the iRobot Home App and have WiFi.
Even while the app’s features are very limited, it’s still preferable to stooping to press the robot’s clean button.
A Round Form
Both robots maintain the characteristically rounded design of Roomba products. The flagship S9 model is the only one with a unique profile.
A square front has the benefit of being more effective at cleaning edges due to its wider extractors and modified side brush.
A Comparison of the Roomba 675 and E5
E5 vs. Roomba 675
We’ll then examine the variations between these two entry-level Roombas.
1. Roll a brush
The brush roll design is one of the most important distinctions between the 675 and E5.
The E5 features the same rubber extractors as the I7, however it still uses the same two-brush technology as the other Roomba models.
extractors for Roombas E5
The 675, in comparison, employs the same outdated blade and bristle combination as the 690.
Counter-rotating brushes for the Roomba 675
Since the E5’s brushes are better at repelling tangles, particularly from pet and human hair, I prefer them over the other two.
These two alternatives are superior to the more expensive Roomba 690.
2. Dustbin Dimensions and Layout
E5 dustbin vs. the Roomba 675
The dust container on the E5 has also been upgraded in terms of both capacity and design.
The largest volume of any Roomba, the 675’s dustbin can only store up to 300 ml of dry dirt.
The E5 has a larger, 500 ml washable dustbin that has a higher capacity.
Because Roomba detached the motor from the trash can, it is washable. Additionally, the filter is upgraded from a regular to a HEPA one.
E5 filter vs. the Roomba 675
If you look closely, you can notice that it has many folds and a large surface area compared to the 675 filter, which has a thin sheet and less effective filtration.
The HEPA filters on the E5 will enable it to filter allergens more effectively in addition to holding more debris.
Dimension
The Roomba is a larger robot than the 675, measuring 13.3 inches broad and 3.7 inches tall in comparison.
The 675 will be able to fit through smaller openings and under lower overhangs thanks to its thinner frame.
Interaction
Finally, we’ll look at the interface adjustments in this section. The E5 uses the exact same button configuration as the more costly I7, with the clean button in the centre and the home and spot buttons on either side.
E5 Roomba interface
The 675, in comparison, keeps the same design as the 690 and 614 Roombas. The spot and dock buttons are located on the top and bottom parts, respectively, with a huge clean button in the centre.
Interface for a Roomba 675
There is no distinction in terms of functionality. Just a cosmetic adjustment to match the latest Roomba models.
How Do the E5 and Roomba 675 Navigate?
These robots, according to iRobot, use adaptive navigational technology. This just implies that it will move randomly.
Like the 690, the Roomba 675 travels at random.
The E5 uses multiple IR sensors above and below to avoid obstacles, so anticipate the same navigation from it.
It lacks a floor tracking sensor, making it unable to detect its location like the more recent Roombas I3 and Roborock E4.
Therefore, it lacks the ability to recharge and resume. When the battery is low, it will operate until it is recharged, but it won’t start cleaning again.
App Attributes
The iRobot Home app works with both models.
The key advantage of the app is being able to schedule and use the robot without being next to it.
You do need a network at home to pair the app and robot. The robot and the app will be connected using this gadget.
The app is responsive and simple to use once it is connected.
Sadly, it doesn’t have all the bells and whistles of a Xiaomi Home app.
For instance, the robot can only be programmed to clean once each day. The days that have previously been chosen are deactivated after specifying the time and day.
I’m sure it would appeal to more consumers if iRobot changed the software and allowed limitless scheduling each day.
How powerful are the Roomba 675 and E5?
Surprisingly, the anemometer data show that the Roomba 675 has a little bit greater airflow than the E5.
6.75 Roomba: 8.37 CFM
E5 Roomba: 6.98 CFM
The E5 rollers’ smaller gap between them might be one of the causes. The lower number could be a result of less air going through the apertures due to the smaller area.
Greater openness on the Roomba 675 encourages improved ventilation (at least in theory).
Cleaning Effectiveness
This section will examine the effectiveness of the Roombas 690 and E5.
I thoroughly tried both, and the outcomes are comparable.
The Roomba E5 performed better overall thanks to its more even pick-up across various surfaces.
Although it came extremely near to taking up surface dirt on carpet, it performed better on hard surfaces and removed embedded dirt from mid-pile carpet.
I prefer the E5’s rubber extractors over the 675’s more conventional brushes.
With the E5, pickup is not a problem, but the limited airflow means that some dirt will remain on the brush assembly.
Cleaning dust or hair doesn’t present a significant issue, though.
Hard Floors
On firm floors, both robots performed admirably, but the E5 performed far better. Even with difficult-to-clean sand, the rollers produced cleaner passes.
The fast-spinning side brush, which sweeps material over a wider area, is a problem for the 675 and E5.
This problem is exacerbated by the random navigation.
What Is More Suitable for Hard Floors?
Despite the decreased airflow, the E5 performs better on hard floors thanks to its rubber extractors.
It was cleaner to pass. It could pick up practically everything in one pass, even with sand.
Sand from a Roomba E5 on a hard floor
Even with increased airflow, other companies like Roborock have trouble with it.
Sand from Roomba 675 on a firm floor
Although the Roomba 675 is also respectable, its more conventional brush performs somewhat worse.
Because of its cleaner pick-up and extractors that require less maintenance, the E5 is my choice for hard surfaces.
The E5 picked up more sand than the 675 in the sand on hard floor test, demonstrating the difference.
Carpet Outcomes
The E5 and the Roomba 675 excel on this surface.
Counter-rotating brushes and a dirt detector may detect dirt embedded deep within the carpet. Despite being above average, it won’t be as good as the more expensive Roombas 960 or 980.
You can only find the dual brush design in iRobot products because it is a patented piece of technology. Even Neato, the primary rival of iRobot, does not offer this feature.
The fact that iRobot products pick up dirt on carpet so well is due in large part to this. When it comes to cleaning carpets, Roomba is among the best robot vacuums available.
Less than a percent separates the results of the Roomba 675 and E5. But the E5 is more effective at removing deep-down grime.
Deep-cleaning Outcomes
Sand may be cleaned thoroughly with the Roomba E5, which collected an average of 89.66% in three testing. That result is pretty remarkable and is comparable to the more expensive Roomba 980 when the lesser airflow is taken into account.
The Roomba 675, in contrast, took up an average of 85.1%.
This demonstrates that the newest extractors in the E5, which have deeper grooves and sit lower to the ground, are better with agitation.
Test for large debris
I tested the performance of both robots on substantial trash, such as Cheerios and Fruit Loops. The brushes on the 675 are better since there is more room between them. In comparison, the E5 performed admirably, although removing too much big debris could clog the entrance leading to the trash can.
Large debris can’t be picked up with the smaller spacing between the rollers, but it still does so.
A huge piece of dirt getting caught in the locking mechanism is another potential problem.
Cheerios on a Roomba E5 roller
Check to see whether there is any debris in this region before cleaning items like cheerios.
The cleaning of edges
These robots’ rounded frames limit their reach, which degrades the effectiveness of their edge cleaning.
For both robots, I dispersed a sizable amount of pet waste to test how much it would gather.
Here is a picture of the Roomba 675 before and after.
Edge cleaning with a roomba 675
the Roomba E5, too.
Pet litter cleanup with the Roomba E5
According to the pictures above, the Roomba 675 really performed better with fewer scraps remaining.
In any case, don’t have high hopes for either of them in this category.
Dustbin Contrast
The Roomba 675 dustbin is larger at 0.6 litres thanks to the wider body and aperture, but the E5 is smaller at 0.4 litres.
The motor of the E5 trashcan has been moved away from it, making it washable in addition to being bigger.
Close-up of a Roomba E5 dustbin inside
The filter must be taken out because it cannot be washed.
Since a portion of the vacuum cleaner is inside the bin, the Roomba 675’s bin cannot be washed.
Look inside the roomba 675 dustbin in detail.
The Roomba 675 bin’s bigger aperture makes it easier to dispose of dirt than the E5’s smaller intake, which is one advantage.
Run-time analysis
Both versions are from Roomba’s most recent line of products. It indicates that it has a Li-ion battery that has a longer lifespan and is less prone to power fade.
The 675 and E5 run for up to 90 minutes on an iRobot 1,800 Li-ion battery.
Noise analysis
Here are the findings of a sound metre test I conducted on both robots from a distance of a few feet.
Cleanroom 675: 65.6 dB
E5 Roomba: 65.6 dB
The outcomes are the same. Although the noise is not unbearably loud, it is significant, and in order to have a nice discussion you will need to slightly raise your voice.
I wouldn’t suggest using this robot while your kids are sleeping late at night.
Maintenance
Regular maintenance is one approach to make sure these robots last a long time. I’ll list the items you should routinely clean or replace.
The primary and side brushes: As dirt and hair build up, these two components endure the most punishment. Lack of cleaning will cause the motor to wear down too quickly and the airflow to decrease.
These robots’ navigation is based on a variety of sensors. The cliff sensors below and the bumper sensors in front of the robot are the most important. Use a clean, dry microfiber towel to wipe these surfaces.
Wheels: The wheel is another component that experiences damage. Check the robot’s underside occasionally to see if dirt has accumulated. Make care to clean the caster wheels and rubber. Cleaning is made simple by Roomba’s modular design. It shouldn’t be challenging to disassemble.
Dustbin: Be sure to clean the dust collection system. After every run, empty it. Dust mites shouldn’t be inside your robot!
Filter: The Roborock 675 and E5’s filters cannot be washed. Tap it on the trash can after each run to remove any dirt that has become lodged there. To keep it clean, a handheld vacuum or shop vac will be useful. Keep in mind that a clogged filter will hinder the robot’s performance, so keep it clean.
I’ve created cleaning guides for these robots. Check them out correctly below.
Cleaning a Roomba E5
Cleaning a Roomba 690
Parts Availability
The ease of obtaining replacement parts is one benefit of owning Roomba products. Online retailers like Amazon sell parts for the 675 and E5 like the battery, filter, and brushes.
On Amazon, you can find even more elusive items like the wheel assembly or side brush motor. If not, you might try looking for these parts on eBay.
The modular design will make replacing these units simple. By taking out a few screwdrivers, the majority of the parts are accessible. A set of Philips screwdrivers is all you need.
Where exactly can I purchase one of these robots?
Both the Roomba 675 and the E5 are available to buy from retailers like as Amazon and Walmart. Please check the links that are provided below for the most up-to-date price information.
Both Amazon and Walmart sell the Roomba 675.
Roomba E5 may be purchased at both Amazon and Walmart.
Please note that I will receive a commission for any purchases made through the links on this page; however, there will be no additional cost to you, so it’s a win-win situation for both of us!
Which is better, Roomba 675 or E5?
Despite the fact that these two robots share quite a few similarities, I believe that the E5, thanks to the modifications that it has received, is a more appealing choice than the 675.
One important factor to consider is the price difference, which isn’t all that great to begin with.
In order to prevent allergens from being expelled through the exhaust, the E5 includes a bigger dustbin that is equipped with a HEPA filter.
Additionally, it has updated rubber extractors, which are more effective at avoiding tangles and are comparable to those found in the more expensive I-Series (I6, I7, and I8).
There Are Three Main Reasons To Go With the Roomba 675.
Less expensive: The Roomba 675 is the most expensive option currently available from iRobot that features WiFi and is compatible with the iRobot Home app.
Particularly effective at cleaning carpets: In tests of deep cleaning, it was able to take up an average of 83% of the debris.
A higher size dustbin: This variation has a trashcan with a capacity of 0.6 litres, making it capable of holding more filth.
Here Are Four Compelling Arguments in Favour of the Roomba E5.
The extractors on the Roomba E5 are designed to take up more debris on carpets, which results in improved cleaning performance (surface and embedded).
Rubber extractors: I prefer the original design of the 675’s brushes to these brushes since these brushes are better at preventing knots while still maintaining agitation.
Dustbin that can be washed The dustbin on the Roomba E5 is washable, making it easier to clean. The robot’s motor is located inside the vacuum.
The improved motor gives the E5 more power than the 675 did, and this gives the E5 an advantage.
The Conclusion Is That the Roomba E5 Is the Superior Choice.
If I had to choose between the Roomba 675 and the E5, I would go with the E5 because the enhancements offer a lot more bang for the buck than the cost overlap does.
The price difference between the Roomba 675 and the E5 is not particularly significant.
In light of the fact that the improvements included in the E5 will make your life far less difficult, picking that model was an easy decision for me to make.
However, the dustbin is on the smaller side and has a more restricted aperture, making it more difficult to clean.
It is not a major problem because it can be cleaned, but you will need to empty it into a trash can that is broader in order to prevent any overflow.
